28 May 2009
Let's force apologists for America to view rape photos
More than a 'few bad apples'

__________________________________________________________________

Within the confines of good taste and a respect for concealing the faces and identities of Iraqi victims of American rapists, the photos referenced in the article reproduced below should be published and shown to the world.

I learned recently while seeking to participate in a forum of nominally intelligent people in my Georgia hometown that Middle America remains in denial about Bush administration excesses and abuses.

Persons I would have thought knew better complained that I was too "negative" in referring to those abuses and in calling for prosecution of Bush, Cheney, and their lieutenants on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

A challenged member of the group averred that torture, when done correctly, is not a bad thing at all--that if a single American life could be saved by subjecting men to waterboarding and worse tortures, such was justified.

A fresh-faced precocious kid on the forum protested that whatever mistakes Bush and Cheney may have made, they had had the best interests of his nation in mind at the time.  And his most emotional response to me was to post a MIDI music file of Kate Smith singing "God Bless America"!  Bless his little heart.  He thinks a rousing rendition of "God Bless America" will heal any "boo-boo" and make the "bad" go away for his nation!

None on the forum that would identify themselves wished to hear more about or discuss further the shame Bush brought to our nation and the horrors he visited on the world from 2000 through 2008.
 
They apparently wish it all swept under the rug and forgotten as an embarrassing skeleton in the closet of the American psyche.

They are ready to move on and forget, as best they can, the Bush years.

I realized during this encounter that Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow are preaching to the choir each night--that Middle America's opinions are not shaped by my heroes and heroines, but by Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.  I realized that we who watch Olbermann and Maddow each night represent, sadly, a thoughtful minority in this nation of shallow hedonistic American Idol junkies.

They STILL don't get it and they STILL don't want to deal with it.

Healing will not occur in America and our reputation in the family of man will not be restored until the crimes committed in our collective name during the Bush years--all of them--are exposed, discussed, accepted and digested, while the perpetrators of those horrendous crimes are tried and punished, as prescribed by the law.

Americans need to see every damned one of those rape photos.  They need to know what their sons and husbands in uniform from this alleged "Christian" nation did to helpless Iraqis at the height of the darkness that was George W. Bush's criminal administration.

Americans need to be forced to the realization torture and abuse of Iraqis did not represent the work of a "few bad apples", but that it was endemic in the American military at the time--that a green light for unimaginable abuses was given by the Bush White House.  It's all documented now, but simpletons that watch Fox News won't hear much about it.

Yes, I say publish the rape photos. Let's see the rapists' faces, the tattoos on their asses, and their names.  These animals that are walking among us even now need to be caged.

D. Grant Haynes

__________________________________________________

Abu Ghraib Abuse Photos 'Show Rape'

Thursday 28 May 2009

By Duncan Gardham and Paul Cruickshank

The Telegraph UK
  
Photographs of alleged prisoner abuse which Barack Obama is attempting to censor include images of apparent rape and sexual abuse, it has emerged.

At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee.
 
Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.

Another apparently shows a female prisoner having her clothing forcibly removed to expose her breasts.
 
Detail of the content emerged from Major General Antonio Taguba, the former army officer who conducted an inquiry into the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq.
 
Allegations of rape and abuse were included in his 2004 report but the fact there were photographs was never revealed. He has now confirmed their existence in an interview with the Daily Telegraph.

The graphic nature of some of the images may explain the US President's attempts to block the release of an estimated 2,000 photographs from prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan despite an earlier promise to allow them to be published...
 
In April, Mr Obama's administration said the photographs would be released and it would be "pointless to appeal" against a court judgment in favour of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

But after lobbying from senior military figures, Mr Obama changed his mind saying they could put the safety of troops at risk.
 
Earlier this month, he said: "The most direct consequence of releasing them, I believe, would be to inflame anti-American public opinion and to put our troops in greater danger."
 
It was thought the images were similar to those leaked five years ago, which showed naked and bloody prisoners being intimidated by dogs, dragged around on a leash, piled into a human pyramid and hooded and attached to wires.
 
Mr Obama seemed to reinforce that view by adding: "I want to emphasise that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib."
 
The latest photographs relate to 400 cases of alleged abuse between 2001 and 2005 in Abu Ghraib and six other prisons. Mr Obama said the individuals involved had been "identified, and appropriate actions" taken.
 
Maj Gen Taguba's internal inquiry into the abuse at Abu Ghraib, included sworn statements by 13 detainees, which, he said in the report, he found "credible based on the clarity of their statements and supporting evidence provided by other witnesses."

Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: "I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would be about 15 to 18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn't covered and I saw [name] who was wearing the military uniform, putting his **** in the little kid's ***.... and the female soldier was taking pictures."

The translator was an American Egyptian who is now the subject of a civil court case in the US.

Three detainees, including the alleged victim, refer to the use of a phosphorescent tube in the sexual abuse and another to the use of wire, while the victim also refers to part of a policeman's "stick" all of which were apparently photographed 


Is there no fathoming depth of depravity of Bush's kick ass warriors?

When you think you have plumbed the depths of the cesspool that was George W. Bush's Iraq policy, something even more revolting bubbles to the surface.

No, CG forum apologists, we don't need to sweep this one under the rug and talk about vegetable gardening and music videos.

http://www.truthout.org/052909R


Posted by DGrantHaynes at 11:39 PM | Link | 0 comments
20 May 2009
How come Arabs are always bungling and stupid in Hollywood depictions?
First we had Borat, and now Zohan

Back in December 2008 at a time when many Americans were justifiably filled with self-congratulatory effulgence over the election of their first African-American president, the Israeli armed forces were quietly and efficiently murdering Palestinians in one of their periodic ethnic cleansing forays into the occupied territories of Palestine. 
 
Israel’s splendid little Gaza War, as it has since been called, began December 27, 2008 and ended less than a month later on January 18, 2009.
 
During that time, approximately 1,400 Palestinian men, women, and children died, while there were 13 reported Israeli deaths. (This represents the usual kill ratio “Western” nations with high tech killing machinery denied all Arabs have come to expect and swagger about when they invade Arab lands.)
 
Israel was in and out of the Gaza Strip while Americans and their news media were focused on New Year’s celebrations and the upcoming inauguration of President Obama. 
 
George W. Bush was the lamest lame duck of the century and Barack Obama was not yet president.  No one was minding the store here and Israel took advantage of the situation, never expecting so much as a wrist slap from their blindly supportive allies in Washington. 
 
Anyway, and to arrive at what some may think a tortured point, I wrote the following statement January 25 decrying, as I have most of my adult life, abuse of Palestinians by Israelis. 
_________________________________
 
25 January 2009
 
Forgiving Israel until 70 times 7
 
Get ready for some PR work from the Jewish lobby
_________________________________
 
Israel Has Fewer Friends Than Ever, Even In America
 
By Rod Nordland – NEWSWEEK
 
Jan. 24, 2009

Israel has never been more isolated. Its best friend, the United States, had vetoed 41 Security Council resolutions condemning Israel in the past three decades, but was about to vote for the Jan. 8 resolution denouncing the attack on Gaza when President Bush intervened, at the behest of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Still, in the face of unprecedented global criticism, the U.S. didn't dare veto, but merely abstained... .
__________________________________
 
But give the Israeli lobby a few months and they will neutralize the negative publicity their latest ethnic cleansing foray into Palestine has engendered.
 
Why, they will come up with another heart rending "undiscovered" story from the European Holocaust.
 
Or Sacha Baron Cohen of “Borat” fame will make another film mocking a non-Jewish ethnic group that sets naïve Americans rolling in the floor with laughter.
 
Or Jewishness will be glorified in another popular television sitcom, film or comedy routine that gets rave reviews in New York and Hollywood. 
 
We Americans will soon forget about the grim-faced, grimy, angry, and ever so "non-Western" Palestinian men, women, and children that were murdered by Israelis as 2009 began. 
 
The Arabs are mere statistics, while Jews are our doctors and dentists and attorneys and beloved entertainers.
 
We'll forget and forgive again and reward Israel with another generation of high tech killing machinery for their next genocidal mission in the land they stole from Palestinians in 1948.
 
It's gone on for 60 years now, folks.  How much longer can Americans be wholly blind to what is fair and just?
 
D. Grant Haynes
__________________________________
 
That was my January statement in the matter.
 
What I did not know at the time was that Adam Sandler had already done Sacha Baron Cohen one better with a lewd, filthy, slapstick, Islamaphobic, Palestinian-baiting absurdity of a film titled, “You Don’t Mess With Zohan”.
 
A friend and I attempted to watch “You Don’t Mess With Zohan” last weekend.
  
I was boiling as soon as I realized the plot involved a super macho Israeli commando, Zohan, (played by Sandler) who spoke matter of factly of killing Palestinians, and who continued to kick their asses at every turn in the slapstick comedic action unfolding.
 
The Arabs were all depicted as simpletons and buffoons whom Zohan could master at any time with the flick of his wrist--or foot—or ass--or anything.
 
The Israeli Jew was superhuman, while the Palestinian Arabs were subhuman.
 
When a bungling Arab was not the butt of the uproarious laughter the film was expected to elicit, Adam Sandler’s anatomical butt was presented on camera, with viewers expected to find that spectacle equally as amusing as a pathetic ass-kicked Arab.
 
About a third of the way through the film, my friend and I looked at one another and, with few words, decided enough was enough. We turned the obnoxious movie off, having paid $3 to view a DVD not worth 3 cents to either of us.
 
America’s wholly subjective and entirely one-sided approach to the Arab-Israeli question has been shaped largely by persons like Adam Sandler and Sacha Baron Cohen who dominate the entertainment industry of this nation.
 
No Arab or other non-Jewish Middle Easterner is ever given an even break by Hollywood. Syrians, Palestinians, Iraqis, and even Iranians are typically depicted as cruel, devious, cowardly, dirty, backstabbing, unworthy of trust, and very different from us. 
  
On the other hand, Jews are always depicted as charming, intelligent, upright, brave, dashing, strong, and, most importantly, vital contributors to Judeo-Christian culture and Western Civilization.
 
This lopsided dichotomy in our perception of Jews v. other Middle Eastern groups is a direct result of more than half a century of conscious propaganda efforts directed, again, primarily from Hollywood, but also from the American news media and a plethora of other institutions heavily influenced by American Jews.
 
The situation is morally reprehensible and should be highly repugnant to any thinking person.
 
A more balanced treatment is in order.
 
Know that I am fully aware many readers of this statement will write me off as an “anti-Semite”.  This is a knee-jerk reaction on your part engendered by generations of cultural conditioning.
 
The epithet of “anti-Semite” is always thrown at any American who calls into question his nation’s unflinching support of Israel in all things.
 
I am not an anti-Semite.
 
I am not a white supremacist.
 
I am not a Klan member.
 
I am not a skinhead or neo-Nazi.
 
I am not ignorant or unthinking.
 
I am, rather, a thinking American who strongly believes the Palestinian Arabs have been dealt a rotten hand since Israel appropriated their ancestral lands beginning in 1948 with the help and ongoing support of my nation.
 
D. Grant Haynes
  

 
If you tremble indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine.
 
                                                                                                                         Ernesto 'Che' Guevara

Posted by DGrantHaynes at 2:59 PM | Link | 0 comments
13 May 2009
Timid tinkering with US health care not solution
Nationalized system needed

A high priority of the Obama administration is an overhaul of the health care system in the United States.

In this writer's opinion, timid approaches that can be most easily sold to Congress--approaches that reflect an attempt to placate the American Medical Association by fine tuning the present system--will amount to no meaningful improvement.

The American health care system needs to be dismantled and rebuilt from the ground up.

The problem with U.S. health care is that it is predicated and built primarily on a foundation of privatized for-profit capitalistic greed rather than on a Hippocratic oath to serve mankind.

Private physicians, physicians' groups, hospitals, medical labs, radiologists, medical insurance companies, and pharmaceutical firms all skim off their share of profits for the pleasure and edification of stockholders before an ailing man's typically astronomical bill is tallied. That, in a word, is why the bill is typically so astronomical.

This greedy, profit-maximizing approach to alleviation of human suffering is morally reprehensible.

The solution to U.S. health care problems is to dismantle entirely the present unworkable, top heavy, profit intensive absurdity of a private health care system-one that lends itself to medical malpractice suits because so much is being done shoddily in the quest for money-and adopt a universal health care program similar to that of every Western nation on earth except the United States.

Let the doctors and specialists now amassing millions in the private medical system become well-paid civil servants of the people in a nationalized system in which their careers and compensations are performance based.

Yes, Americans would probably have to pay for an equitable health care system with higher taxes. But many Americans are now paying hundreds or thousands monthly for co-pays, supplemental coverages, catastrophic coverages, prescribed drugs not on lists provided by medical insurance companies of approved drugs, and in a hundred other small and invidious schemes that line the pockets of various middle men in the medical and pharmaceutical industries of our hodgepodge system. Eliminate those unfair burdens on the American family and most would be happy to apply some of the savings to a fair and equitable universal system in which the only criteria for admission and treatment is need.

The receptionist's first question would then be, "what's your medical or dental problem today?", rather than, "do you have an insurance card and could I make a copy of it?".

National health insurance programs assure the health of the public in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and virtually every European nation from Great Britain, to Germany, to Liechtenstein. And life expectancy is greater in these nations and 38 others than in the United States, according to the CIA World Factbook. Our nation ranks an unenviable 45th on the list.

Even South Africa, a very poor nation by Western standards and only decades removed from apartheid and bantustans, is attempting to provide universal health care for its masses.

In Asia, Japan has free universal health care, and China and India, with their incomprehensible (to an American) problems of poverty, overcrowding, and squalor, are committed to the morality of the concept that a man, woman, or child is entitled to basic health care-not because he or she has a Blue Cross card, but because he or she, as a citizen of the nation, has an unalienable right to be free from sickness, debilitation, and pain.

Not so here, but one can hope that will soon change.

The United States, the wealthiest and most technologically advanced nation on earth, ranks 45th in life expectancy, partly because privatized health care is unavailable to millions.
 
We should adopt a single payer nationalized system and seek to eliminate the immoral disparity between medical services available to the poor on the one hand, and those available to the prosperous or wealthy on the other.

Label the single payer universal health care system that must come "socialized medicine", if you wish.

Socialized medicine--a pejorative term only among brainwashed Americans---would be a good thing.  


 

Posted by DGrantHaynes at 2:07 PM | Link | 0 comments
10 May 2009
Lying endemic within U.S. military
I'd believe the Taliban before an American 'military spokesman'

Concern over burns on Afghans caught in battle
 
By JASON STRAZIUSO and RAHIM FAIEZ, Associated Press Writers Jason Straziuso And Rahim Faiez,
 
Associated Press Writers– May 10, 2009
 
KABUL – Afghanistan's leading human rights organization said Sunday it was investigating the possibility that white phosphorus was used in a U.S.-Taliban battle that killed scores of Afghans. The U.S. military rejected speculation it had used the weapon but left open the possibility Taliban militants did.
 
White phosphorus can be employed legitimately in battle, but rights groups say its use over populated areas can indiscriminately burn civilians and constitutes a war crime.
 
Afghan doctors are concerned over what they are calling "unusual" burns on Afghans wounded in last Monday's battle in Farah province, which President Hamid Karzai has said may have killed 125 to 130 civilians… .
 
______________________________________
 
Americans lied through their pearly white orthodontically modified teeth about the use of white phosphorous bombs on civilian populations in Fallujah, Iraq, in November 2004. There is no reason to believe they aren’t lying now about the use of this ordnance on civilians in Afghanistan in 2009. 
 
Lying is an established policy of the American government. I would believe a Taliban spokesman before an American military officer any time, as would most others in the world.
 
As in Iraq, Americans are so ruthlessly abusing their military superiority in Afghanistan that initially friendly and sympathetic Afghanis like Afghan President Hamid Kazai are turning against the American presence there.
 
Arrogant Americans are hated throughout the world and for understandable reasons.
 
Watch a few clips off this site and tell me how proud you are of your country.
 
 
D. Grant Haynes

Posted by DGrantHaynes at 2:28 PM | Link | 0 comments
05 May 2009
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses...
But don't give me any Muslims or Mexicans
Muslim Demographics an Islamaphobic rant
 
The You Tube video titled, “Muslim Demographics” now making the rounds in the United States, can be seen at the above URL.
 
What follows represents my opinion in the matter.
 
D. Grant Haynes
________________________________________________________________
 
This is as vile a piece of Islamaphobic hate mongering as I have ever seen. It was, in all likelihood, put together by either a conservative Protestant Christian organization or by Zionists—often the same people. The maker of this video is no "friend of (a) muslim". 
Every ethnic group ever coming into America to be assimilated was looked upon as a "threat" by the ones already here and established. Ask the Native Americans who were here at least 10,000 years before Bible punching Christians and Jews waded ashore.
 
The Italians who came in the 19th Century were called "wops" and were distrusted initially.  Now, their grandchildren are part of the mainstream. We all appreciated Sinatra.
 
The so-called "Shanty Irish"--almost all Catholic and poor--came in waves after the 19th Century potato famine in their land.  They were initially distrusted and called “Paddies” by those already here. The Irish assimilated quickly and gave us John Fitzgerald Kennedy in a couple of American generations. 
 
What the producer of this despicable presentation ignores in his or her hate mongering is that the next generation of Muslims in Great Britain, Canada, or the United States will have gained enough education and westernization to aspire to give their children the best opportunities. They will wisely elect to have two or three offspring rather than eight or ten, as grandchildren of 19th Century Irish immigrants are now doing, the Pope be damned.
 
The American experience changes people.  Succeeding generations dispense with Old World ways of thinking and living.  They become Americans and, while preserving the best of their own cultures, hopefully, dispense with the darkest and most unworkable baggage brought along. This will occur with Muslim immigrants too.
 
America is a melting pot and her strength grows out of her diversity.  I cannot accept the proposition that white Anglo-Saxon Protestants are God's anointed and that we should man barricades to keep out Muslims and Hispanics.
 
I have no desire to adopt Islam any more than Judaism or Billy Graham's Christianity, but no Muslim has ever done me harm.  Nor has any Hispanic.
 
On the other hand, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney--both blue-eyed Protestants from families that have been here many generations--damned nearly destroyed my nation between 2000 and 2008. 
 
And now a man of color, Barack Hussein Obama, is beginning to lead us out of the darkness of the Bush Era.
 
Posted by DGrantHaynes at 9:56 PM | Link | 0 comments
04 May 2009
Oh, God, tell me I am hallucinating!
Surely not more news about that 9/16 second nipple indecency!

 Nipple Saga Continues

Ms. Jackson will be an elderly woman with the nipple in question hanging in her lap when still another generation of esteemed Supreme Court justices wrestle with this weighty and pendulous matter.

Please see what I wrote at the time of the nipple incident:

http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=35966

D. Grant Haynes 


Justices Tell Appeals Court to Revisit Super Bowl Incident  

By DAVID STOUT

May 4, 2009

WASHINGTON - What may be the most controversial fraction of a second in television history, the momentary baring of the singer Janet Jackson's breast during the halftime show of the 2004 Super Bowl, will be debated once again in federal court.

The Supreme Court on Monday set aside a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Philadelphia, that had overturned a $550,000 fine imposed by the Federal Communications Commission on CBS for the "wardrobe malfunction," as the fateful moment has been described.

The high court said the Third Circuit should give "further consideration" to its conclusion last July 21 that the F.C.C. was wrong to fine the network. A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit said the F.C.C. had not given broadcasters enough advance notice that it was tightening its policies involving fleeting displays of nudity, and that CBS should not have been held responsible for the actions of Ms. Jackson and her performing partner, Justin Timberlake... .

The lyrics sung by Mr. Timberlake were arguably not as vulgar, although he seemed to have been overly inspired by them. "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song," he uttered, just before the big moment.

The exposure of Ms. Jackson's breast lasted nine-sixteenths of one second, the Third Circuit noted. That is barely enough time for the speediest wide receiver to cover five yards on a dry field, but plenty of time to generate litigation that has lasted half a decade, with accompanying lawyers' fees.

"We are confident that in reviewing the case the Third Circuit will again recognize that the Super Bowl incident, while inappropriate and regrettable, was not and could not have been anticipated by CBS," the network said. "This remains an important issue for the entire broadcasting industry because it recognizes that there are rare instances, particularly during live programming, when despite best efforts it may not be possible to block unfortunate fleeting material."

And if the Third Circuit should once again rule in favor of CBS, the case could make its way back to the Supreme Court, assuming that the F.C.C. refuses to give up the fight... .  


Posted by DGrantHaynes at 2:13 PM | Link | 0 comments
01 May 2009
As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap
Men meet their karma occasionally

Arrogant indifference to animal suffering has a price tag

Human beings have brought swine influenza, avian influenza, and Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, otherwise known as "mad cow disease", upon themselves by their cruel and callous mistreatment of animals.

Agribusiness' farming factories in which animals spend their lives in crowded cages, pens, enclosures, and pigsties, knowing only their own excrements on their way to slaughter, are a blight on the collective soul of humanity.  We all have a frightful karmic debt to pay, at best.

Those specifically involved in or supporting such vile and miscreant abuses of our brothers in the animal kingdom through either occupational choices or eating habits should not complain at the inconvenience and pain diseases spawned in the spiritual darkness of the factory farm and the slaughter house killing line visit upon them.

D. Grant Haynes 


You have just dined, and however scrupulously the slaughterhouse is concealed in the graceful distance of miles, there is complicity.  

 Ralph Waldo Emerson 


(From The Huffington Post, May 1, 2009)

Our Hunger for Cheap Meat Has Created Swine Flu

By Johann Hari, Columnist, London Independent

April 30, 2009

A swelling number of scientists believe swine flu has not happened by accident. No: they argue this global pandemic - and all the deaths we are about to see - is the direct result of our demand for cheap meat. So is the way we produce our food really making us sick as a pig?

At first glance, this seems wrong. All through history, viruses have mutated, and sometimes they have taken nasty forms that scythe through the human population. This is an inescapable reality we just have to live with, like earthquakes and tsunamis. But the scientific evidence increasingly suggests that we have unwittingly invented an artificial way to accelerate the evolution of these deadly viruses - and pump them out across the world. They are called factory farms. They manufacture low-cost flesh, with a side dish of viruses to go.

To understand how this happens, you have to compare two farms. My grandparents had a pig farm in the Swiss mountains, with around twenty swine at any one time. What happened there if, in the bowels of one of their pigs, a virus mutated and took on a deadlier form? At every stage, the virus would meet stiff resistance from the pigs' immune systems. They were living in fresh air, on the diet they evolved with, and without stress - so they had a robust ability to fight back. If the virus did take hold, it would travel only as far as the sick hog could walk. So if the virus would then have around twenty other pigs to spread and mutate in - before it would hit the end of its own evolutionary path, and die off.

 If it was a really lucky, plucky virus, it might make it to market - where it would come up against more healthy pigs living in small herds. It has little opportunity to fan out across a large population of pigs or evolve a strain that could be transmitted to humans.

Now compare this to what happens when a virus evolves in a modern factory farm. In most swine farms today, six thousand pigs are crammed snout-to-snout in tiny cages where they can barely move, and are fed for life on an artificial pulp, while living on top of cesspools of their own stale faeces.

 Instead of having just twenty pigs to experiment and evolve in, the virus now has a pool of thousands, constantly infecting and reinfecting each other. The virus can combine and recombine again and again. The ammonium from the waste they live above burns the pigs' respiratory tracts, making it easier yet for viruses to enter them. Better still, the pigs' immune systems are in free-fall. They are stressed, depressed, and permanently in panic, making them far easier to infect. There is no fresh air or sunlight to bolster their natural powers of resistance. They live in air thick with viral loads, and they are exposed every time they breathe in.

As Dr. Michael Greger, director of Public Health and Animal Agriculture at the Humane Society of the United States, explains: "Put all this together, and you have a perfect storm environment for these super-strains. If you wanted to create global pandemics, you'd build as many of these factory farms as possible. That's why the development of swine flu isn't a surprise to those of us in public health community. Back in 2003, the American Public Health Association - the oldest and largest in world - called for a moratorium of factory farming because they saw something like this would happen. It may take something as serious as a pandemic to make us realize the real cost of factory farming."

Many of the detailed studies of factory farms that have been emerging in the past few years reinforce this argument. Dr Ellen Silbergeld is Professor of Environmental Health Sciences at Johns Hopkins University. She tells me her detailed on-the-ground studies led her to conclude there is "very much" a link from factory farms to the new, more powerful forms of flu we are experiencing. "Instead of a virus only having one spin of the roulette wheel, it has thousands and thousands of spins, for no extra cost. It drives the evolution of new diseases."

Until yesterday, we could only speculate about the origins of the current H1N1 virus killing human beings - but now we know more. The Center for Computational Biology at Columbia University has studied the virus and found that it is not a new emergence of a triple human-swine-bird flu virus. It is a slight variant on a virus we have seen before. We can see its family tree - and its daddy was a virus that evolved in the artificial breeding ground of a vast factory farm in North Carolina.

Did this strain evolve, too, in the same circumstances? Already, the evidence is suggestive, although far from conclusive. We know that the city where this swine flu first emerged - Perote, Mexico - contains a massive industrial pig farm, and houses 950,000 pigs. Dr Silbergeld adds: "Factory farms are not biosecure at all. People are going in and out all the time. If you stand a few miles down-wind from a factory farm, you can pick up the pathogens easily. And, like in the US, the manure from these farms isn't disposed of according to any regulations, even though we know viruses can remain alive in it for more than a month. They can just sit in cesspools. The viruses can be transmitted from there by flies."

It's no coincidence that we have seen a sudden surge of new viruses in the past decade at precisely the moment when factory farming has intensified so dramatically. For example, between 1994 and 2001, the number of American pigs that live and die in vast industrial farms in the US spiked from 10 percent to 72 percent. Swine flu had been stable since 1918 - and then suddenly, in this period, went super-charged.

How much harm will we do to ourselves in the name of cheap meat? We know that bird flu developed in the world's vast poultry farms. And we know that pumping animal feed full of antibiotics in factory farms has given us a new strain of MRSA. It's a simple, horrible process. The only way to keep animals alive in such dirty conditions is to pump their feed full of antibiotics. But this has triggered an arms race with bacteria, which start evolving to beat the antibiotics - and emerge as in the end as pumped-up, super-charged viruses invulnerable to our medical weapons. This system gave birth to a new kind of MRSA that now makes up 20 percent of all human infections with the virus. Sir Liam Donaldson, the British government's Chief Scientist, warns: "Every inappropriate use in animals or agriculture [of antibiotics] is potentially a death warrant for a future patient."

Of course, agribusinesses is desperate to deny all this is happening: their bottom line depends on keeping this model on its shaky trotters. But once you factor in the cost of all these diseases and pandemics, cheap meat suddenly looks like an illusion.

We always knew that factory farms were a scar on humanity's conscience - but now we know they are a scar on our health. If we carry on like this, bird flu and swine flu will be just the beginning of a century of viral outbreaks. As we witness a global pandemic washing across the world, we need to shut down these virus factories - before they shut down even more human lives.

 


 

Posted by DGrantHaynes at 12:49 AM | Link | 0 comments