Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Libya's new regime has introduced itself on the world stage as a cadre of Western-sponsored thugs that are, at the very least, no better than was Muammar Gaddafi.
They and the world know how Gaddafi died. He was shot through the left temple by one of the tennis-shoed "rebels" the West supported with countless air strikes for half a year and more.
For the new regime to desecrate the man's remains by continuing to keep them on public display in a meat locker while calling for an "investigation" into his death reeks of disingenuous chicanery.
They have learned their first lesson well from the US and other Western administrations that put them in power: Lie without reservation whenever such serves the geopolitical goals of your regime or your puppet masters.
D. Grant Haynes
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Now, since Obama's regime, all of a sudden, folks have gotten mad, and want to take America Back...BACK TO WHAT/WHERE is my question?????
After The 8 Years Of The Bush/Cheney Disaster, Now You Get Mad?
You didn't get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and appointed a President.
You didn't get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate Energy policy and push us to invade Iraq.
You didn't get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed.
You didn't get mad when the Patriot Act got passed.
You didn't get mad when we illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us.
You didn't get mad when we spent over 800 billion (and counting) on said illegal war.
You didn't get mad when Bush borrowed more money from foreign sources than the previous 42 Presidents combined.
You didn't get mad when over 10 billion dollars in cash just disappeared in Iraq.
You didn't get mad when you found out we were torturing people.
You didn't get mad when Bush embraced trade and outsourcing policies that shipped 6 million American jobs out of the country.
You didn't get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping Americans.
You didn't get mad when we didn't catch Bin Laden.
You didn't get mad when Bush rang up 10 trillion dollars in combined budget and current account deficits.
You didn't get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.
You didn't get mad when we let a major US city, New Orleans, drown.
You didn't get mad when we gave people who had more money than they could spend, the filthy rich, over a trillion dollars in tax breaks.
You didn't get mad with the worst 8 years of job creations in several decades.
You didn't get mad when over 200,000 US Citizens lost their lives because they had no health insurance.
You didn't get mad when lack of oversight and regulations from the Bush Administration caused US Citizens to lose 12 trillion dollars in investments, retirement, and home values.
You finally got mad when a black man was elected President and decided that people in America deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick. Yes, illegal wars, lies, corruption, torture, job losses by the millions, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, and the worst economic disaster since 1929 are all okay with you, but helping fellow Americans who are sick...Oh, Hell No!!
(Thank you, Ces', the most brilliant canuck in North America, for sharing this!)
The photo ops are too staged and perfect.
The "anti-Gaddafi" fighters are too young and are without uniforms in many cases. They lack the look of battle-hardened soldiers.
Something is wrong in this picture.
I don't believe all that the media of the West is peddling about the war in Libya.
If Muammar Gaddafi has been toppled, it was done by NATO aircraft with a lot of logistical support from the United States, if not direct involvement. It was not done by those young men being photographed by the media.
I question what the motives of the West are in toppling this North African Muslim regime. I have always questioned those motives.
Seldom does the United States do anything to avenge "human rights violations". More often than not, as in Iraq, they invent new ways to violate human rights, if so doing will further world capitalism's cause.
I do not doubt that Muammar Gaddafi was a ruthless strong arm dictator, as was Saddam Hussein. But in both cases, I seriously question the alleged altruism involved in the US and Great Britain's enthusiasm for righting wrongs and liberating Arab masses.
Does Libya have petroleum reserves?
Do western companies stand to gain anything monetarily in the Libya shake up?
Again, I am suspicious of all the cheerleading in the West about a rag tag band of non-uniformed young men routing Gaddafi.
I question the factual nature of the reporting and I question the motives of those that have bombed Muammar Gaddafi into oblivion, if that is truly the case.
http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16066567
D. Grant Haynes
________________________________________
September 16, 2011
Please view following report from Russia Today. It confirms precisely what I anticipated in my commentary above. -- D. Grant Haynes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEvsKv0Tzuo&feature=player_embedded#!
________________________________________
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/08/31/martin.obama.jobs.boehner/
Democrats begged Barack Obama not to give in to John Boehner on the prime time speech issue, as on many other issues in the recent past. But the President had blinked and given the GOP another victory before the ink was dry in pleas that he act presidential one time and not be frightened by blue-eyed John Boehner.
When will you accept, Democrats, that Barack Obama lacks the courage or spunk to stand up and defy Republicans on any issue? Ever?
He will always defer to a John Boehner or Mitch McConnell to the last day of his abortive one-term presidency.
Obama is a nice guy--too nice to be president of this nation of scoundrels.
We need a kick-ass president who would have demanded Wednesday night's air time, regardless of a Republican debate.
After all, Barack Obama IS the President and occupies that unique "bully pulpit" of which Teddy Roosevelt spoke.
Obama seems unable to grasp the potential for good that was his when Americans elected him. He has frittered it all away. He will go down in history as a weak president.
D. Grant Haynes